Judges are likely to be queried and sanctioned if they fail to conclude criminal cases assigned to them within set time.
This is contained in the new National Judicial Policy inaugurated by the National Judicial Council in Abuja on October 24.
The NJP came into force earlier in April, 2016.
There have been instances before the
advent of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, when
criminal cases, involving politically-exposed persons or other
influential Nigerians, dragged on for over a decade.
But the new NJP requests federal and
state judiciaries to set targets for the completion of various
categories of cases, including criminal matters.
Sub-section 2.5.2 of the policy provides
that judges must be made to provide reasons for failure to dispose of
criminal cases within the target time.
This directive, captured under the
policy on judicial performance in section 2.5 of the NJP, seeks to focus
on “strategies to strengthen judicial performance through constant
monitoring and evaluation and through continuous monitoring and
assessment of the adequacy of the facilities available to judges for
efficient performance.”
The policy categorises cases as small
claims, fast-track cases, complex criminal cases, and normal civil
cases, but goes ahead to impose duties on judiciary authorities to
demand explanation from judges who fail to conclude criminal cases
within time.
It seeks to strengthen the quarterly
evaluation mechanisms already put in place and introduce new measures to
ensure “improved performance of judicial officers.”
The policy reads in part, “Such measures will include measures to:
“Promote self-evaluation by judges and by state and federal judiciaries;
“Request each judiciary to devise time utilisation and management and monitoring mechanisms and guidelines by judges;
“Request state and federal judiciaries
to set targets for completion of cases classified as: small claims,
fast-track cases, complex cases, criminal cases and normal civil cases
and monitor compliance.
“Demand that reason be given for criminal cases not disposed of within the set target period.”
The policy also makes it mandatory for each judiciary to submit action plan on how to clear backlog of civil cases.
It adds that the measures for improved
performance of judicial will “require each judiciary to submit action
plan and strategies for clearing backlog of civil cases pending for more
than three months and criminal cases pending for more than 18 months;
“Require each judiciary to submit to an
annual judicial system audit and survey of the effectiveness and
efficiency of its judicial system.”
The NJP covers other issues such as
judicial appointment policy, judicial discipline policy, judicial code
of conduct policy, judicial education and training policy, case flow
management policy, judicial administration and court management policy
and transparency and anti-corruption policy, among others.
The NJP deals with Judicial Discipline
Policy under Section 2.2, where it makes provisions for the Judicial
Discipline Regulations.
It states in its Section 2.2.3 that the
Judicial Discipline Regulations may specify among other 16 items, the
procedure of investigation of a judge, powers of council to order a
review and composition of review body, and powers of interim suspension
by NJC.
But the NJC had said, acting in line
with NBA’s suggestion, by suspending judges under probe without
receiving petitions against them and probing the petitions, would
violate Section 158 of the Constitution.
The NJP, also among others, directs that
any petition filed against a judge that is leaked or discussed in the
media before or after it is submitted for investigation, will not be
entertained.
It also reiterates the Code of Conduct for Judicial Officers barring judges from accepting gifts.
Copyright NEWSPHERE2.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from NEWSPHERE2.
All rights reserved. This material, and other digital content on this website, may not be reproduced, published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or in part without prior express written permission from NEWSPHERE2.
Contact: editor@Newsphere2.com
0 comments: